包含com/login/identify的词条

成都市安全教育平台登录入口：https://chengdu.xueanquan.com/cdlogin.html

成都市安全教育平台登录入口：

一、课间活动

1、不跳楼梯，不从高处往下跳，不爬栏杆，不滑扶手，不做有危险的活动。

2、上下楼梯不奔跑，开展体育活动、课间游戏要到运动场。

3、上厕所要避开高峰，高年级同学要照顾低年级同学。

4、雨天路滑要小心，同学之间不推搡。

二、教室活动安全教育

1、防磕碰：不在教室中追逐、打闹，做剧烈的运动和游戏，防止磕碰受伤。

2、防摔：需要登高打扫卫生、取放物品时，要请他人加以保护，注意防止摔伤。

3、防坠落：无论教室是否处于高层，都不要将身体探出阳台或者窗外，谨防不慎发生坠楼的危险。

4、防挤压：教室的门、窗户在开关时容易压到手，也应当处处小心，要轻轻地开关门窗，留意是否会夹到他人的手。

5、防火灾：不带打火机、火柴、烟花爆竹、小鞭炮等危险物品进校园，杜绝玩火、燃放烟花爆竹等行为。

6、防意外伤害：不准带锥、刀、剪等锋利、尖锐的工具，图钉、大头针等文具，不能随意放在桌子上、椅子上，防止有人受到意外伤害。

三、交通安全教育

1、行路安全

首先要认识并掌握各种交通信号灯的含义：绿灯亮时，准许通过，但转弯的车辆不准妨碍直行车辆和行人通过；黄灯亮时，不准通过，但已超过停止线后车辆和已进入人行横道的行人可继续通行；红灯亮时，不准通行，黄灯闪烁时，须在确保安全原则下通行。

人行横道信号的含义：绿灯亮时，准许通过；绿灯闪烁时，不准行人进入人行横道，但已进入人行横道的可继续通行；红灯亮时，不准通行。

横穿马路时，要养成看交通信号的好习惯。同时，还要注意来往车辆，不要追逐、猛跑，斜穿或突然改变行路方向。不要倚坐护栏和隔离墩，也不要图省事翻越或钻越护栏和隔离墩过马路，而应走过街天桥和过街地道。在没有人行穿越道的路程，须直行通过，主动避让来往车辆，不要在车辆临近时抢行。

在城市里的马路上，一般都用白色或黄色的线把马路分成机动行驶的快车道，自行车、人力三轮车和其他慢行车辆行走的慢车道，及行人走的人行道，在人行道上不要几个人并排行走，在没有划出人行道的路段，要尽量靠边行走。低年级的同学们出门时，要有家长的带领，在行路时，如果有人在马路对面打招呼，不要突然横穿马路以防发生事故。

走路要专心，不能东张西望，看书看报或因想事、聊天而忘记观察路面情况。那样很可能被路面上的石块、木棍伴倒，摔伤或撞倒树上、电线杆上，甚至可能发生车祸。路边停有车辆的时候，要注意避开，免得汽车突然启动或打开车门碰伤。不能在马路上踢球、溜旱冰、跳皮筋、做游戏或追逐打闹，更不要扒车、追车、站在路中间强行拦车或者抛物击车。雾天、雨天走路更要小心，最好穿上颜色鲜艳（最好是黄色）的衣服、雨衣，打鲜艳的伞。晚上上街，要选择有路灯的地段，特别注意来往车辆和路面情况，以防发生意外事故或不慎掉入修路挖的坑里及各种无盖的井里。

穿越公路时，要听从交通民警的指挥，要遵守交通规则，做到“红灯停，绿灯行”及“一慢、二看、三通过”

2、骑车安全

按照交通部门的规定，不满12周岁的儿童，不准骑自行车，三轮车和推拉各种人力车上街。就是满12岁，骑车上街必须遵守交通规则。骑自行车上街走慢车道，不能进入机动车行驶的快车道，也不能在人行道上骑自行车。在没有划分机动车、非机动车道的路段，要尽量靠右行驶，不能逆行，也不能到路中后往马路中间跑，这样看不见路上来往的车辆，很容易出事。

3、打出租安全

打出租汽车时，不要站在机动车道上。一旦不幸遇到翻车事故，不要死死地抓住车厢的某个部位。而要去抱住自己的头，并缩起全身才是上策。如果遇上交通事故，要维护好现场，同时呼喊大人，通知医院，以便迅速抢救伤员，并及时向交通警察或治安人员报警；还要记住肇事车辆的车牌号码。

4、铁路及乘火车安全

不能在铁路口或铁路上行走逗留、打闹，拣拾废余物品，也不能钻车或扒车。通过铁路道口时，必须听从道口看守人员的指挥，栏杆放下表示火车就要通过，千万不能钻栏杆过道口。不要横穿铁路，更不能在铁轨上玩耍。如果有火车来了，必须站到铁轨5米以外，在电汽化铁路线上，还要注意不能攀爬接触网支柱和铁塔，也不要在铁塔边休息或玩耍，防止触电。在站台等车时，要站在安全线以外，如果在没有安全护栏的小站上，一定要离开轨道两米以外，火车进站时速度很快，离近了就有被卷入的危险。

在火车上，不要玩火；不要到两节车厢的连接外去玩，这样容易被夹伤或挤伤；千万不能把头、身子、手等伸到窗外，免得被车窗卡住，或是被沿线的信号设备、树木等刮伤。用完的塑料饭盒、水瓶、包装袋等茶物，不能顺手扔到窗外。 ;

智学网官网登录地址：http://www.zhixue.com/login.html

智学网官网登录地址：

1、打开网页，在地址栏里输入，回车进入智学网登录界面

2、点击登录，输入用户名和密码，即可登录：

个人中心设置

在个人中心里可以实现个人资料、账号密码的修改以及班级的创建和学生、老师的信息管理等操作。将鼠标放在头像上，点击“个人中心”，即可进入个人中心界面：

个人中心里列出了用户的基本信息：

在个人资料里可以修改个人信息，如姓名、性别、生日等：

在账号管理可以修改用户密码：

校园考试是检验和评价阶段性教学成果的有效手段，但目前只从成绩单一维度进行分析，无法体现共性需求、个体差异，也无法针对个人做连续性、发展性、趋势性评价。 智学网是科大讯飞面向学校日常考试及发展性教学与学评价需求推出的基于知识点地图和优质题库资源的智能化教学辅导平台，为用户提供更加简单易用的系统操作和更加全面完善的资源服务，通过大数据分析充分挖掘校园考试价值，通过基于云服务的PC及移动终端综合方案为每一名老师和学生提供针对性教和个性化学的信息化环境与服务，实现人人皆学、处处能学、时时可学。

智学网平台功能

人工智能的过程化教学大数据采集分析

基于手机、扫描仪、阅卷机等各类智能终端设备实现随堂练习、课后作业、测验联考等各类教学场景下的过程性教学数据采集，数据采集技术突破使得全学科智能批改和自动分析。

知识图谱的个性化学习分析和推荐

智学网通过学生学习大数据分析，实现个性化、基于知识图谱的学习诊断，不但可以帮助学生挖掘错题根源，还可以推送相匹配的微课讲解和难度适中的习题资源为学生针对性学习。

以学习者为中心的教育评价

为各级教育系统、老师、学生、家长系统的提供基于知识点的综合教育评价服务，协同北师大未来教育高精尖创新中心探索建立以学习者为中心的教学新模式的途径与方法，并建立基于问题诊断的基础教育质量改进服务体系。 ;

NoClassDefFoundError: ch/qos/logback/classic/spi/ThrowableProxy

报错日志com/login/identify：

解决方案com/login/identify：

解决冲突。

附com/login/identify：

No SLF4J providers were found.

This warning, i.e. not an error, message is reported when no SLF4J providers could be found on the class path. Placing one (and only one) of slf4j-nop.jar slf4j-simple.jar, slf4j-log4j12.jar, slf4j-jdk14.jar or logback-classic.jar on the class path should solve the problem. Note that these providers must target slf4j-api 1.8 or later.

In the absence of a provider, SLF4J will default to a no-operation (NOP) logger provider.

Please note that slf4j-api version 1.8.x and later use the ServiceLoader mechanism. Earlier versions relied on the static binder mechanism which is no longer honored by slf4j-api. Please read the FAQ entry What has changed in SLF4J version 1.8.0? for further important details.

If you are responsible for packaging an application and do not care about logging, then placing slf4j-nop.jar on the class path of your application will get rid of this warning message. Note that embedded components such as libraries or frameworks should not declare a dependency on any SLF4J providers but only depend on slf4j-api. When a library declares a compile-time dependency on a SLF4J provider, it imposes that provider on the end-user, thus negating SLF4J\’s purpose.

Class path contains SLF4J bindings targeting slf4j-api versions prior to 1.8

Planning for the advent of Jigsaw (Java 9), slf4j-api version 1.8.x and later use the ServiceLoader mechanism. Earlier versions of SLF4J relied on the static binder mechanism which is no longer honored by slf4j-api.

In case SLF4J finds no providers targeting SLF4J 1.8 but finds instead bindings targeting SLF4J 1.7 or earlier, it will list the bindings it finds but otherwise ignores them.

See also the FAQ entry What has changed in SLF4J version 1.8.0? for further important details.

IllegalStateException: org.slf4j.LoggerFactory in failed state. Original exception was thrown EARLIER.

This IllegalStateException is thrown post-initialization and informs the user that initialization of LoggerFactory has failed.

NOTE It is important to realize that the exception causing the failure was thrown at an earlier stage. This earlier exception should provide more valuable information about the root cause of the problem.

The method o.a.commons.logging.impl.SLF4FLogFactory#release was invoked.

Given the structure of the commons-logging API, in particular as implemented by SLF4J, the o.a.commons.logging.impl.SLF4FLogFactory#release() method should never be called. However, depending on the deployment of commons-logging.jar files in your servlet container, release() method may be unexpectedly invoked by a copy of org.apache.commons.logging.LogFactory class shipping with commons-logging.jar.

This is a relatively common occurrence with recent versions of Tomcat, especially if you place jcl-over-slf4j.jar in WEB-INF/lib directory of your web-application instead of $TOMCAT_HOME/common/lib, where $TOMCAT_HOME stands for the directory where Tomcat is installed. In order to fully benefit from the stability offered by jcl-over-slf4j.jar, we recommend that you place jcl-over-slf4j.jar in $TOMCAT_HOME/common/lib without placing a copy in your web-applications.

Please also see bug #22.

Operation [suchAndSuch] is not supported in jcl-over-slf4j.

An UnsupportedOperationException is thrown whenever one of the protected methods introduced in JCL 1.1 are invoked. These methods are invoked by LogFactory implementations shipping with commons-logging.jar. However, the LogFactory implemented by jcl-over-slf4j.jar, namely SLF4FLogFactory, does not call any of these methods.

If you observe this problem, then it is highly probable that you have a copy of commons-logging.jar in your class path overriding the classes shipping with jcl-over-slf4j.jar. Note that this issue is very similar in nature to the warning issued when the \”o.a.commons.logging.impl.SLF4FLogFactory.release()\” method is invoked, discussed in the previous item.

Detected logger name mismatch

Logger name mismatch warnings are printed only if the slf4j.detectLoggerNameMismatch system property is set to true. By default, this property is not set and no warnings will be printed even in case of a logger name mismatch.

SINCE 1.7.9 The warning will be printed in case the name of the logger specified via a class passed as an argument to the LoggerFactory.getLogger(Class) method differs from the name of the caller as computed internally by SLF4J.

For example, the following code snippet

will result in the warning

SLF4J: Detected logger name mismatch. Given name: \”com.foo.Kangaroo\”; computed name: \”com.acme.Fruit\”.

but only if slf4j.detectLoggerNameMismatch system property is set to true.

No warning will be issued for the special case where the class in which the logger is defined is a super-type of the class parameter passed as argument. For example,

If you come across a mismatch warning which cannot be explained, then you might have spotted a white elephant, that is a very rare occurrence where SLF4J cannot correctly compute the name of the class where a logger is defined. We are very interested to learn about such cases. If and when you spot an inexplicable mismatch, please do file a bug report with us.

Failed to load class org.slf4j.impl.StaticLoggerBinder

This warning message is reported when the org.slf4j.impl.StaticLoggerBinder class could not be loaded into memory. This happens when no appropriate SLF4J binding could be found on the class path. Placing one (and only one) of slf4j-nop.jar slf4j-simple.jar, slf4j-log4j12.jar, slf4j-jdk14.jar or logback-classic.jar on the class path should solve the problem.

SINCE 1.6.0 As of SLF4J version 1.6, in the absence of a binding, SLF4J will default to a no-operation (NOP) logger implementation.

If you are responsible for packaging an application and do not care about logging, then placing slf4j-nop.jar on the class path of your application will get rid of this warning message. Note that embedded components such as libraries or frameworks should not declare a dependency on any SLF4J binding but only depend on slf4j-api. When a library declares a compile-time dependency on a SLF4J binding, it imposes that binding on the end-user, thus negating SLF4J\’s purpose.

Multiple bindings were found on the class path

SLF4J API is designed to bind with one and only one underlying logging framework at a time. If more than one binding is present on the class path, SLF4J will emit a warning, listing the location of those bindings.

When multiple bindings are available on the class path, select one and only one binding you wish to use, and remove the other bindings. For example, if you have both slf4j-simple-1.8.0-beta2.jar and slf4j-nop-1.8.0-beta2.jar on the class path and you wish to use the nop (no-operation) binding, then remove slf4j-simple-1.8.0-beta2.jar from the class path.

The list of locations that SLF4J provides in this warning usually provides sufficient information to identify the dependency transitively pulling in an unwanted SLF4J binding into your project. In your project\’s pom.xml file, exclude this SLF4J binding when declaring the unscrupulous dependency. For example, cassandra-all version 0.8.1 declares both log4j and slf4j-log4j12 as compile-time dependencies. Thus, when you include cassandra-all as a dependency in your project, the cassandra-all declaration will cause both slf4j-log4j12.jar and log4j.jar to be pulled in as dependencies. In case you do not wish to use log4j as the the SLF4J backend, you can instruct Maven to exclude these two artifacts as shown next:

NOTE The warning emitted by SLF4J is just that, a warning. Even when multiple bindings are present, SLF4J will pick one logging framework/implementation and bind with it. The way SLF4J picks a binding is determined by the JVM and for all practical purposes should be considered random. As of version 1.6.6, SLF4J will name the framework/implementation class it is actually bound to.

Embedded components such as libraries or frameworks should not declare a dependency on any SLF4J binding but only depend on slf4j-api. When a library declares a compile-time dependency on a SLF4J binding, it imposes that binding on the end-user, thus negating SLF4J\’s purpose. When you come across an embedded component declaring a compile-time dependency on any SLF4J binding, please take the time to contact the authors of said component/library and kindly ask them to mend their ways.

slf4j-api version does not match that of the binding

An SLF4J binding designates an artifact such as slf4j-jdk14.jar or slf4j-log4j12.jar used to bind slf4j to an underlying logging framework, say, java.util.logging and respectively log4j.

Mixing mixing different versions of slf4j-api.jar and SLF4J binding can cause problems. For example, if you are using slf4j-api-1.8.0-beta2.jar, then you should also use slf4j-simple-1.8.0-beta2.jar, using slf4j-simple-1.5.5.jar will not work.

NOTE From the client\’s perspective all versions of slf4j-api are compatible. Client code compiled with slf4j-api-N.jar will run perfectly fine with slf4j-api-M.jar for any N and M. You only need to ensure that the version of your binding matches that of the slf4j-api.jar. You do not have to worry about the version of slf4j-api.jar used by a given dependency in your project. You can always use any version of slf4j-api.jar, and as long as the version of slf4j-api.jar and its binding match, you should be fine.

At initialization time, if SLF4J suspects that there may be a api vs. binding version mismatch problem, it will emit a warning about the suspected mismatch.

Logging factory implementation cannot be null

This error is reported when the LoggerFactory class could not find an appropriate binding. Placing one (and only one) of slf4j-nop.jar, slf4j-simple.jar, slf4j-log4j12.jar, slf4j-jdk14.jar or logback-classic.jar on the class path should prove to be an effective remedy.

Detected both log4j-over-slf4j.jar AND slf4j-log4j12.jar on the class path, preempting StackOverflowError.

The purpose of slf4j-log4j12 module is to delegate or redirect calls made to an SLF4J logger to log4j. The purpose of the log4j-over-slf4j module is to redirect calls made to a log4j logger to SLF4J. If SLF4J is bound withslf4j-log4j12.jar and log4j-over-slf4j.jar is also present on the class path, a StackOverflowError will inevitably occur immediately after the first invocation of an SLF4J or a log4j logger.

Here is how the exception might look like:

subsequent lines omitted…

SINCE 1.5.11 SLF4J software preempts the inevitable stack overflow error by throwing an exception with details about the actual cause of the problem. This is deemed to be better than leaving the user wondering about the reasons of the StackOverflowError.

For more background on this topic see Bridging legacy APIs.

Detected both jcl-over-slf4j.jar AND slf4j-jcl.jar on the class path, preempting StackOverflowError.

The purpose of slf4j-jcl module is to delegate or redirect calls made to an SLF4J logger to jakarta commons logging (JCL). The purpose of the jcl-over-slf4j module is to redirect calls made to a JCL logger to SLF4J. If SLF4J is bound with slf4j-jcl.jar and jcl-over-slf4j.jar is also present on the class path, then a StackOverflowError will inevitably occur immediately after the first invocation of an SLF4J or a JCL logger.

Here is how the exception might look like:

SINCE 1.5.11 SLF4J software preempts the inevitable stack overflow error by throwing an exception with details about the actual cause of the problem. This is deemed to be better than leaving the user wondering about the reasons of the StackOverflowError.

For more background on this topic see Bridging legacy APIs.

Failed to load class \”org.slf4j.impl.StaticMDCBinder\”

This error indicates that appropriate SLF4J binding could not be found on the class path. Placing one (and only one) of slf4j-nop.jar, slf4j-simple.jar, slf4j-log4j12.jar, slf4j-jdk14.jar or logback-classic.jar on the class path should solve the problem.

MDCAdapter cannot be null

This error is reported when org.slf4j.MDC class has not been initialized correctly. Same cause and remedy as the previously listed item.

A number (N) of logging calls during the initialization phase have been intercepted and are now being replayed. These are subject to the filtering rules of the underlying logging system.

SINCE 1.7.15 Logging calls made during the initilization phase are recorded and replayed post-inititilization. Note that the replayed logging calls are subject to filtering by the underlying logging system.

In principle, replaying only occurs for apllications which are already multi-threaded at the time the first logging call occurs.

See also substitute loggers.

Substitute loggers were created during the default configuration phase of the underlying logging system

Highly configurable logging systems such as logback and log4j may create components which invoke loggers during their own initialization. See issue LOGBACK-127 for a typical occurrence. However, since the binding process with SLF4J has not yet completed (because the underlying logging system was not yet completely loaded into memory), it is not possible to honor such logger creation requests.

To avoid this chicken-and-egg problem, SLF4J creates substitute loggers during this phase (initialization). Calls made to the substitute loggers during this phase are simply dropped. After the initialization completes, the substitute logger will delegate logging calls to the appropriate logger implementation and otherwise will function as any other logger returned by LoggerFactory.

If any substitute logger had to be created, SLF4J will emit a a listing of such loggers. This list is intended to let you know that any logging calls made to these loggers during initialization have been dropped.

See also intercepted and replayed logging calls.

SLF4J versions 1.4.0 and later requires log4j 1.2.12 or later

The trace level was added to log4j in version 1.2.12 released on August 29, 2005. The trace level was added to the SLF4J API in version 1.4.0 on May 16th, 2007. Thus, starting with SLF4J 1.4.0, the log4j binding for SLF4J requires log4j version 1.2.12 or above.

However, as reported in issue 59, in some environments it may be difficult to upgrade the log4j version. To accommodate such circumstances, SLF4J\’s Log4jLoggerAdapter will map the TRACE level as DEBUG.

java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: org/slf4j/event/LoggingEvent

Logback-classic version 1.1.4 and later require slf4j-api version 1.7.15 or later.

With an earlier slf4j-api.jar in the classpath, attempting introspection of a Logger instance returned by logback version 1.1.4 or later will result in a NoClassDefFoundError similar to that shown below.

Placing slf4j-api.jar version 1.7.15 or later in the classpath should solve the issue.

Note that this problem only occurs with logback version 1.1.4 and later, other bindings such as slf4j-log4j, slf4j-jdk14 and slf4j-simple are unaffected.

国际会议模板页脚的Identify applicable sponsor/s here. (sponsors)是什么意思

在此处添加基金号，比如我（中山大学）写的一篇论文，导师给加的基金号为：

This work was supported in part by the Program of Guangzhou ZhujiangSci-Tech New Star, in part by Sysung-Etri project, and in part by GuangdongLeaning-Research-Production project under grant 2012B090600009.

JSP上传图片做头像报错 系统找不到指定文件

肯定找不到啊com/login/identify，com/login/identify你运行的时候获取的是tomcat容器的目录啊com/login/identify，但是你的文件却在其com/login/identify他的盘或文件下，肯定不对的，要将文件复制到tomcat容器里面去com/login/identify！！

小小追书登录次数过多

1.如果你短时间内频繁登录微博，系统可能会认为是恶意操作。建议你检查一下网络环境，过段时间再试一下。2.假如你没有频繁登录，出现此类现象的原因可能是您所在IP段的其他用户频繁登录所致，局域网或网吧用户，更换电脑或局域网环境后试试ADSL用户，重启电脑或路由器。

com/login/identify的介绍就聊到这里吧，感谢你花时间阅读本站内容，更多关于、com/login/identify的信息别忘了在本站进行查找喔。